Legal question and answer by best advocates
"A user submits a question, and a response is provided, displayed in a two-row format with the question and
answer clearly separated."
Question
Q: Can I file a civil suit instead of Section 138 claim?Answer
A:
Yes, you can file a civil suit instead of, or even along with, a Section 138 NI Act complaint – but the two are different remedies. Let me break it down for you:
Based on dishonour of cheque.
Filed in Magistrate Court.
Purpose: To punish the drawer with jail up to 2 years and/or fine.
Outcome: Many cases end in settlement/compounding because the drawer wants to avoid criminal conviction.
Filed under Order 37 CPC (Summary Suit for Recovery) or a normal civil recovery suit.
Purpose: To recover the cheque amount with interest and costs.
Outcome: Court can pass a money decree, enforceable against the drawer’s property.
| Point | Section 138 NI Act | Civil Suit |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Criminal | Civil |
| Goal | Punishment + Deterrence | Recovery of money |
| Time | Faster disposal (but still backlog) | Civil suits may take longer |
| Burden | Strict liability on drawer | Plaintiff must prove debt/liability |
| Result | Jail/Fine/Settlement | Money decree (enforceable) |
Yes, you can file both simultaneously:
138 NI Act case for criminal liability.
Civil suit for actual recovery of cheque amount + interest.
Many lawyers advise doing both:
Criminal pressure under Section 138
Civil decree for enforceable recovery
If limitation for Section 138 is missed (notice not sent in time).
If you only want money back, not criminal punishment.
If cheque was a security cheque and doesn’t strictly qualify under Section 138.
By Advocate BK Singh
(Delhi High Court)