Live Chat +91-9625961599

What if an authorised signatory signs the cheque? (Not liable)

Legal question and answer by best advocates
"A user submits a question, and a response is provided, displayed in a two-row format with the question and answer clearly separated."

Chat on WhatsApp +91-9625961599
Question Icon

Question

Q: What if an authorised signatory signs the cheque? (Not liable)

Answer

A:

If a cheque is signed by an authorised signatory on behalf of a company, the company itself is primarily liable for a cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The authorised signatory is usually not personally liable, because he signs the cheque only in his official capacity as a representative of the company.


Legal Position

  • Section 141 NI Act makes the company the principal offender when a company-issued cheque is dishonoured.

  • The authorised signatory is not personally responsible just for signing the cheque.

  • However, if the signatory is also a director or officer in charge of the company’s financial affairs, liability may extend to him, but only in that managerial role.


Example

  • If an employee signs a company cheque as an authorised signatory, the company is liable, not the employee personally.

  • If a director who is actively managing the company signs the cheque, then both the company and that director can be prosecuted.


Key Takeaway

An authorised signatory who signs a cheque on behalf of a company is not personally liable for cheque bounce. The company is primarily liable, and only those directors or officers responsible for the company’s day-to-day financial operations may also face liability under Section 141 NI Act.

.

By Advocate BK Singh

(Delhi High Court)