Live Chat +91-9625961599

Legal Questions

Chat on WhatsApp +91-9625961599
(Public) August 15, 12:20 PM Recent
(Public) August 12, 12:52 PM Recent
(Public) August 08, 09:51 PM Recent
Q. Case against Indian Council of Social Science and Research ICSSR regarding not checking answer sheet of candidate in marking scheme as formate wise

Ans.

If the Indian Council of Social Science and Research (ICSSR) or any examination authority fails to check an answer sheet properly as per the prescribed marking scheme or format, the affected candidate has the right to challenge the evaluation process.

Under Indian law, evaluation of answer scripts must be fair, transparent, and in line with the notified scheme of examination. If a candidate can show that answers were not assessed according to the official marking scheme, it amounts to arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution (Right to Equality).

The candidate may:

  1. File a representation or appeal before ICSSR or the examination committee, requesting a re-evaluation/re-checking as per the prescribed marking scheme.

  2. If no remedy is provided, the candidate can approach the High Court under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction) by filing a writ petition against ICSSR. Courts in India have consistently held that while academic evaluation cannot be interfered with lightly, if there is clear proof of non-adherence to the marking scheme or procedural irregularity, judicial review is permissible.

  3. If multiple candidates are affected, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) can also be filed to ensure fairness in evaluation.


 Conclusion


A candidate can take legal action against ICSSR if the answer sheet was not checked in accordance with the marking scheme or format. The proper legal remedy is to first seek re-evaluation through official channels, and if denied, approach the High Court through a writ petition for enforcement of fair evaluation.

(Public) July 20, 01:29 PM Recent
(Public) July 18, 02:56 PM Recent
Q. Legal alternatives to the expensive legal heir-ship procedure

Ans.

Obtaining a legal heirship certificate through the court can sometimes be a lengthy and expensive process. However, there are alternative legal documents that may be accepted by banks, government offices, and other institutions depending on the purpose.

  1. Succession Certificate (for debts and securities)

    • Issued by a civil court under the Indian Succession Act.

    • Cheaper and faster in some states compared to a full legal heirship procedure.

    • Useful for claiming debts, bank deposits, insurance, and securities.

  2. Surviving Member Certificate / Family Member Certificate

    • Issued by the local Tehsildar, Revenue Office, or Municipal Authorities.

    • Recognizes the surviving family members of the deceased.

    • Often accepted by government departments, banks, and utilities for basic transfers.

  3. Registered Will

    • If the deceased left behind a valid Will, probate of the Will (in some states only) can serve as proof of legal rights without the need for heirship proceedings.

  4. Nominee Declaration

    • In bank accounts, insurance policies, PF, and investments, the nominee can directly claim proceeds without heirship certificates.

    • However, the nominee only acts as a trustee for legal heirs unless specifically mentioned in law.

  5. Affidavit with Indemnity Bond

    • Some banks, companies, or societies accept a notarized affidavit of legal heirs along with an indemnity bond signed by surviving members.

    • This is a faster, low-cost option for transfer of assets like bank balances or society shares.



Legal heirship is not always necessary. Depending on the nature of the asset, alternatives like a succession certificate, family member certificate, nomination, or an affidavit with indemnity bond can be used to save time and cost. However, for immovable property and high-value disputes, a formal heirship certificate or succession proceedings may still be required.